
Move fast & slow down faster. Lessons from leading teams through a revolution.
About
AI solutions are revolutionizing the customer service industry, and Zendesk is truly doubling down on the opportunity. However, every revolution comes with a price. And that meant that the team needed to adapt and change as well. Let's explore how to maintain sanity in an environment that's constantly shifting beneath your feet, and when it makes sense to tactically slow down in order to speed up in the long run.
Watch the full talk
Watch this WaysConf session, then continue with related talks or explore the current programme.
Talk in brief
Using biathlon as a metaphor for alternating speed and control, this talk shows how a distributed design organization changed its cross-team rituals during a period of rapid AI product development. The team replaced agenda-heavy status meetings with repeatable, facilitated formats supported by asynchronous templates, shared critique, and visible links to goals and quality measures. Some rituals expanded globally, while others were retired or redesigned. The broader lesson is to treat organizational practices as products: define their purpose, test them at manageable scale, evolve them from evidence, and stop them when they no longer create connection or better work.
Key takeaways
- 01
Design organizations need speed transitions
Rapid delivery and careful alignment are different modes; leaders must help teams move deliberately between them instead of demanding constant acceleration.
Watch from 0:19 - 02
Replace status with purposeful connection
Cross-team rituals became more useful when meetings centered on critique, shared understanding, and decisions rather than reporting against an agenda.
Watch from 4:59 - 03
Templates create a base for iteration
A stable asynchronous structure helped people prepare, enabled multiple disciplines to contribute, and made the ritual itself easier to improve.
Watch from 7:29 - 04
Connect shared work to goals and quality
Adding visuals, OKR links, and quality questions helped participants understand the work and evaluate it in a consistent organizational context.
Watch from 10:29 - 05
Retire rituals that outlive their purpose
Successful practices should still be treated as experiments; scaling, replacing, or ending them is part of maintaining an effective operating system.
Watch from 18:39
Video chapters
- 0:11Biathlon as an organizational metaphor
The opening connects fast movement and precise control to the demands placed on modern teams.
- 2:21Leading design across a distributed company
The scale, time zones, product silos, and AI work establish the coordination challenge.
- 4:59From status meetings to shared rituals
Design leaders create repeatable spaces for connection and cross-team learning.
- 7:29Templates enable critique and participation
Asynchronous preparation and a common structure bring design systems, content, and leadership into one review.
- 10:20Improving the format through evidence
Screenshots, goals, and internal quality measures are added as the team learns what participants need.
- 13:20A second practice for functional alignment
A facilitated cross-team format helps the design function coordinate without a separate transformation program.
- 16:20Principles for running ritual experiments
Clear purpose, adaptation, and lightweight facilitation are offered as guidance rather than a fixed recipe.
- 19:00Scale, replace, or stop
The closing recognizes that organizational practices must continue changing with the work.
Read edited transcript highlights
These concise notes were edited from automatic captions and checked against the talk structure. They are not a verbatim transcript.
Speed is not one permanent mode
Biathlon captures the leadership problem because athletes must raise their heart rate for speed, then regain control for accurate shooting. Product organizations face a similar transition. They need momentum, but they also need moments of attention, shared judgment, and correction. The goal is not to choose fast or slow; it is to become capable of changing mode when the work demands it.
Watch from 0:11A ritual should solve a coordination problem
The design leadership team moved away from meetings dominated by agenda items and status reporting. The replacement was designed around cross-team connection: participants could see work, discuss decisions, and build shared context. This change made the meeting’s value observable and allowed the organization to ask whether the format improved collaboration rather than merely whether people attended.
Watch from 4:59Structure makes participation easier
A common asynchronous template reduced the effort of preparing and understanding each review. Experienced designers retained room to adapt it, while content and design-system colleagues could contribute in the same space. Because the input had a stable shape, leaders could see patterns across teams and the organization could improve the ritual without rebuilding it from nothing.
Watch from 7:29The meeting format became a product
The team changed the template as it learned. Screenshots made projects easier to grasp, links to objectives clarified strategic relevance, and quality questions connected delivery with internal standards. A practice that began among a small regional group eventually supported teams across time zones because its evolution was grounded in observed needs rather than a one-time rollout.
Watch from 10:20Useful rituals are still temporary
The final advice is to define the purpose first, preserve an experimental mindset, and avoid copying another organization’s format literally. Some rituals grew from local practice to global coordination; others were stopped or replaced. Ending a familiar meeting is not failure when its purpose has changed. It is evidence that the operating system is being maintained.
Watch from 19:00



