
Empowerment młodych! Jak badać młodzież na przykładzie case study badań agencji Hearts&Heads
About
Żarówki LED z ciepłym światłem mogą się przydać do badań młodych ludzi. I trochę pluszu.
Ach! Ta dzisiejsza młodzież, ciśnie się na usta.
A ja powiem Wam: młodzi ludzie dają się lubić i chcą opowiadać o sobie, jeśli tylko stworzy im się odpowiednie warunki do tego, żeby pozwolili nam na chwilę wejść do ich świata. Posłuchać, jak u nich jest.
Studium dwóch badań: studentów i chęci ich zaangażowania społecznego dla programu Projektor oraz badanie licealistów i ich postrzegania nauki dla Centrum Nauki Kopernik przeprowadzone przez agencję Hearts&Heads pozwoli na głębsze zrozumienie tego, jak dotrzeć do świata młodych.
Będzie o konkretach - zastosowanych metodach, sposobie przeprowadzenia badania i wnioskach jakie z tego wyciągnęliśmy. A przede wszystkim będzie o tym, co robić (a czego nie), żeby młodzi ludzie wpuścili nas na chwilę do swojego świata i pozwolili zrozumieć ich prawdziwe potrzeby. Młodzież jaka jest niby każdy wie, ale… pozwólmy się nam, “dorosłym” badaczom trochę zaskoczyć!
Watch the full talk
Watch this WaysConf session, then continue with related talks or explore the current programme.
Talk in brief
A field guide to qualitative research with teenagers and young adults, based on studies for the Copernicus Science Centre and a social-engagement program. The talk argues that young participants quickly detect forced familiarity and respond better to authentic adults who listen without presenting themselves as unquestionable experts. Recruitment combined social media with trusted schools and educators, while the sessions used collages, stories, speculative event design, repeated focus groups, cultural probes, photo diaries, personal exhibitions, and letters to volunteering. These methods let participants choose how deeply to reveal their world and gave clients evidence about needs beneath the literal ideas. Curiosity, psychological safety, non-judgment, and meaningful influence are the foundations of engagement.
Key takeaways
- 01
Approach young people without performing youth
Participants value accessible, honest researchers more than adults who imitate their language or claim authority over their experience.
Watch from 2:01 - 02
Recruit through digital and trusted local channels
Social media widened reach, while teachers, schools, universities, and direct recommendations made participation feel credible.
Watch from 10:00 - 03
Make participation meaningful as well as rewarded
Compensation matters, but young people also engage when they see that an institution genuinely wants their perspective.
Watch from 14:01 - 04
Use creative prompts to surface hidden needs
Collages, fantasy scenarios, photographs, and letters allow emotions and motivations to emerge without demanding direct disclosure.
Watch from 16:01 - 05
Let participants control the depth of disclosure
Clear boundaries, non-judgment, and self-directed tasks create safety while preserving the young person’s agency.
Watch from 26:00
Video chapters
- 0:01Why forced familiarity damages trust
The opening contrasts authentic curiosity with adult attempts to look or speak like the teenagers being studied.
- 4:00Researchers as bridges between generations
Young people want room to explain their own world rather than receiving another adult interpretation of it.
- 8:00Two studies and the recruitment challenge
Projects on science and social engagement establish the participant groups, research questions, and outreach methods.
- 12:00Adventure, recognition, and motivation
Travel, professional settings, peer connection, compensation, and genuine influence all shape willingness to participate.
- 16:01Collage, stories, and imagined experiences
Projective workshops move from concrete memories to fantasy so researchers can interpret underlying emotional needs.
- 22:01Cultural probes and participant-led evidence
Photo diaries and personal exhibitions let students guide researchers through everyday life and meaningful objects.
- 28:00Love letters and principles for engagement
A structured letter exercise reveals mixed emotions before the talk closes with authenticity, co-creation, and curiosity.
Read edited transcript highlights
These concise notes were edited from automatic captions and checked against the talk structure. They are not a verbatim transcript.
Authenticity matters more than generational mimicry
Researchers can become so anxious about a generational gap that they imitate youth language, clothing, or mannerisms. Teenagers are especially alert to that performance. They do not require the researcher to be the same as them; they need an adult who is available, admits what they do not know, and creates enough space for participants to describe their own experience without correction.
Watch from 2:01Recruitment works through credibility and reach
The studies used social channels belonging to the agency, clients, and partners, but also relied on schools, university groups, teachers, and directors. Those analogue relationships helped the invitation travel through people young participants already recognized. More people volunteered than the studies required, showing that research can attract interest when the purpose and experience are made clear.
Watch from 10:00Fantasy can reveal a practical requirement
When teenagers imagined an ideal science experience, they proposed ideas such as major expeditions or travelling with classmates. The literal concepts were not treated as a specification. Researchers interpreted the needs underneath them, including exploration, community, novelty, and comfort. Creative exercises are valuable because they give participants a language for needs that may be difficult to state directly.
Watch from 18:02Cultural probes return control to participants
Students documented parts of their day and collected materials connected with social engagement between two group sessions. They decided what to photograph, what objects mattered, and how much context to share. The artifacts then anchored the second conversation in real routines and memories, helping the researchers understand time, motivation, and emotion without imposing a rigid observation script.
Watch from 22:01A letter makes ambivalence easier to express
Participants wrote to a volunteering program as though it were a relationship, completing prompts about what they valued, what disappointed them, and what they wanted from a future version. Addressing an organization rather than a person created useful distance from difficult feelings. The familiar metaphor produced richer accounts of mentorship, courage, frustration, and unmet expectations than a conventional evaluation question.
Watch from 28:00

